Why I'm Posting Bail Money for Julian Assange
Yesterday, in the Westminster Magistrates Court in London, the
lawyers for WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange presented to the judge a
document from me stating that I have put up $20,000 of my own money to
help bail Mr. Assange out of jail.
Furthermore, I am publicly offering the assistance of my website, my
servers, my domain names and anything else I can do to keep WikiLeaks
alive and thriving as it continues its work to expose the crimes that
were concocted in secret and carried out in our name and with our tax
dollars.
We were taken to war in Iraq on a lie. Hundreds of thousands are now
dead. Just imagine if the men who planned this war crime back in 2002
had had a WikiLeaks to deal with. They might not have been able to pull
it off. The only reason they thought they could get away with it was
because they had a guaranteed cloak of secrecy. That guarantee has now
been ripped from them, and I hope they are never able to operate in
secret again.
So why is WikiLeaks, after performing such an important public service,
under such vicious attack? Because they have outed and embarrassed those
who have covered up the truth. The assault on them has been over the
top:
**Sen. Joe Lieberman says WikiLeaks "has violated the Espionage Act."
**The New Yorker's George Packer calls Assange "super-secretive, thin-skinned, [and] megalomaniacal."
**Sarah Palin claims he's "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands" whom we should pursue "with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."
**Democrat Bob Beckel (Walter Mondale's 1984 campaign manager) said about Assange on Fox: "A dead man can't leak stuff ... there's only one way to do it: illegally shoot the son of a bitch."
**Republican Mary Matalin says "he's a psychopath, a sociopath ... He's a terrorist."
**Rep. Peter A. King calls WikiLeaks a "terrorist organization."
And indeed they are! They exist to terrorize the liars and warmongers
who have brought ruin to our nation and to others. Perhaps the next war
won't be so easy because the tables have been turned -- and now it's Big
Brother who's being watched ... by us!
WikiLeaks deserves our thanks for shining a huge spotlight on all this.
But some in the corporate-owned press have dismissed the importance of
WikiLeaks ("they've released little that's new!") or have painted them
as simple anarchists ("WikiLeaks just releases everything without any
editorial control!"). WikiLeaks exists, in part, because the mainstream
media has failed to live up to its responsibility. The corporate owners
have decimated newsrooms, making it impossible for good journalists to
do their job. There's no time or money anymore for investigative
journalism. Simply put, investors don't want those stories exposed. They
like their secrets kept ... as secrets.
I ask you to imagine how much different our world would be if WikiLeaks had existed 10 years ago. Take a look at this photo.
That's Mr. Bush about to be handed a "secret" document on August 6th,
2001. Its heading read: "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US." And on
those pages it said the FBI had discovered "patterns of suspicious
activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings."
Mr. Bush decided to ignore it and went fishing for the next four weeks.
But if that document had been leaked, how would you or I have reacted? What would Congress or the FAA have done? Was there not a greater chance that someone, somewhere would have done something if all of us knew about bin Laden's impending attack using hijacked planes?
But back then only a few people had access to that document. Because the
secret was kept, a flight school instructor in San Diego who noticed
that two Saudi students took no interest in takeoffs or landings, did
nothing. Had he read about the bin Laden threat in the paper, might he
have called the FBI? (Please read this essay
by former FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, Time's 2002 co-Person of the Year,
about her belief that had WikiLeaks been around in 2001, 9/11 might have
been prevented.)
Or what if the public in 2003 had been able to read "secret" memos from
Dick Cheney as he pressured the CIA to give him the "facts" he wanted in
order to build his false case for war? If a WikiLeaks had revealed at
that time that there were, in fact, no weapons of mass destruction, do
you think that the war would have been launched -- or rather, wouldn't
there have been calls for Cheney's arrest?
Openness, transparency -- these are among the few weapons the citizenry has to protect itself from the powerful and the corrupt. What if within days of August 4th, 1964 -- after the Pentagon had made up the lie that our ship was attacked by the North Vietnamese in the Gulf of Tonkin -- there had been a WikiLeaks to tell the American people that the whole thing was made up? I guess 58,000 of our soldiers (and 2 million Vietnamese) might be alive today.
Instead, secrets killed them.
For those of you who think it's wrong to support Julian Assange because
of the sexual assault allegations he's being held for, all I ask is that
you not be naive about how the government works when it decides to go
after its prey. Please -- never, ever believe the "official story." And
regardless of Assange's guilt or innocence (see the strange nature of
the allegations here),
this man has the right to have bail posted and to defend himself. I
have joined with filmmakers Ken Loach and John Pilger and writer Jemima
Khan in putting up the bail money -- and we hope the judge will accept
this and grant his release today.
Might WikiLeaks cause some unintended harm to diplomatic negotiations
and U.S. interests around the world? Perhaps. But that's the price you
pay when you and your government take us into a war based on a lie. Your
punishment for misbehaving is that someone has to turn on all the
lights in the room so that we can see what you're up to. You simply
can't be trusted. So every cable, every email you write is now fair
game. Sorry, but you brought this upon yourself. No one can hide from
the truth now. No one can plot the next Big Lie if they know that they
might be exposed.
And that is the best thing that WikiLeaks has done. WikiLeaks, God bless
them, will save lives as a result of their actions. And any of you who
join me in supporting them are committing a true act of patriotism.
Period.
I stand today in absentia with Julian Assange in London and I ask the
judge to grant him his release. I am willing to guarantee his return to
court with the bail money I have wired to said court. I will not allow
this injustice to continue unchallenged.
P.S. You can read the statement I filed today in the London court here.
P.P.S. If you're reading this in London, please go support Julian Assange and WikiLeaks at a demonstration at 1 PM today, Tuesday the 14th, in front of the Westminster court.
명문!
트위터 하시죠? #Mooreandme로 검색하시면 지난 6일간 뜨겁게 달궈진 '농성장'을 구경하실 수 있을 겁니다. 삼엘님이 명문이라고 칭찬한 이 편지 때문에 마이클무어는 졸지에 강간옹호론자가 되었슴다. ㅋㅋ
답글삭제@meta - 2010/12/21 02:49
답글삭제무어옹은 그동안 우파들에게 당했던 다양한 형태의 인신공격의 하나 쯤으로 치부하는 모양이더군요;; 여튼 대형 사고를 본인이 쳤다는 자각이 있으면 아무랑 자는 거 아니라는;;;
그 양반, 항복 선언 했습니다. 반성문도 쓰고 사과도 하고. ㅋ
답글삭제http://tigerbeatdown.com/2010/12/22/mooreandme-and-then-he-came-down/
삼엘님 트윗을 보니까 '보석금을 내줬다고 강간옹호자로 몰렸다'라고 하셨더군요. 의도적인 왜곡이 아니었다면 무성의한 상황파악이 원인이 되었다고 해야할 발언입니다.
답글삭제마침, 가디언의 리치 아담스가 잘 정리한 게 있네요. 참고하시길.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/dec/28/michael-moore-mooreandme-twitter?CMP=twt_gu
@meta - 2010/12/29 05:16
답글삭제이런. 구글 블로거로 통합된다고 블로그 쥔장도 답글을 못 다는 상태로 보름을 지났더니;;; 제 실수입니다. ㅠㅠ